← Archive
August 3, 2026Retirement

The Daily Brief for Benefits Professionals

BenefitsWire

Retirement Plans

August 3, 2026

— § —

9 items · ~2 min read

Top of the Brief

Ninth Circuit Vacates Class Certification in 401(k) Fee Case, Holding District Court Failed to Rigorously Analyze Typicality and Adequate Representation While Affirming Plaintiffs’ Standing

“Although it affirmed standing, the court concluded that the district court erred by failing to conduct the rigorous analysis Rule 23 requires.”

In this issue

Regulatory Action and Guidance (3)  ·  Retirement Plans (3)  ·  Litigation (2)  ·  General Benefits (1)

Regulatory Action and Guidance

3 items
Amendment to Exemption for Certain Prohibited Transactions Involving AT&T Inc. (Together With AT&T Inc.'s Affiliates, AT&T or the Applicant) Located in Dallas, Texas

“This notice amends PTE 2014-06 to permit certain modifications (the Modifications) that were made with respect to the terms and provisions governing the Plan's holding and disposition of the Preferred Interests. Absent this amendment to PTE 2014-06 (Exemption Amendment), the Modifications would have resulted in violations of the prohibited transaction provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).” MORE >>

Source: Federal Register

Alternative Method for Carrying Broker-Dealers to Comply with Certain Nonbank Trustee Rules

“This IRS Notice (N-26-32) outlines an alternative method for carrying broker-dealers to comply with certain nonbank trustee rules. This guidance is relevant for retirement plans that utilize nonbank trustees and broker-dealers for holding plan assets, providing clarity on compliance procedures.” MORE >>

Source: irs.gov

DOL Investment Safe Harbor May Not Do Much for Retirement Income

The Department of Labor’s proposed rule on selecting designated investment alternatives for retirement plans includes a safe harbor for fiduciaries choosing retirement income solutions. But experts say that may not mean much for uptake. MORE >>

Source: American Retirement Association

Retirement Plans

3 items
NYU Stern Gets It Right: The DOL’s New 401(k) Rule Protects Private Equity—Not Retirees

“The Department of Labor describes the proposal as creating a neutral framework for fiduciaries evaluating alternative investments. Yet one of its central features is reducing litigation exposure for plan fiduciaries who follow prescribed procedures when selecting investments. Private Equity industry supporters argue this encourages innovation; consumer advocates contend it shifts legal protection toward fiduciaries and asset managers rather than participants by blocking transparency.” MORE >>

Source: The Commonsense 401(k) Project

How Flexible Can Annuities Be?

“Questions of portability and flexibility for both plan sponsors and participants can impede adding guaranteed retirement income offerings.” MORE >>

Source: PLANSPONSOR

How Could AI Help Public DC Plans?

“When people hear “AI,” they often think of large language models and virtual assistants. But for public Defined Contribution (DC) plans, AI may prove just as valuable in areas like prediction, pattern recognition, workflow automation, and decision support.” MORE >>

Source: NCPERS

Litigation

2 items
Ninth Circuit Vacates Class Certification in 401(k) Fee Case, Holding District Court Failed to Rigorously Analyze Typicality and Adequate Representation While Affirming Plaintiffs’ Standing

“Although it affirmed standing, the court concluded that the district court erred by failing to conduct the rigorous analysis Rule 23 requires.” MORE >>

Source: Roberts Disability Law

Appellate Court Clips Arbitration Clause in ERISA Suit

Though the plan document appeared to require arbitration in pursuing recovery in a fiduciary breach suit, a federal appellate court has affirmed the decision of the district court in rebuffing that requirement. MORE >>

Source: American Retirement Association

General Benefits

1 item
Lessons from NCR’s $47.7 Million Top Hat Plan Settlement – 409A Compliance Is Not a Contract Defense

“Although the dispute unfolded against the backdrop of Code Section 409A’s plan termination rules, the bottom line for plan sponsors is this: top hat plans are unilateral contracts that employees accept through performance, and once accepted, the express terms of the plan document govern. While compliance with Section 409A’s termination and liquidation exception is required to avoid significant adverse tax consequences, a termination that satisfies the regulations can still be a breach of contract if the plan document does not clearly permit the lump sum and valuation of the payout.” MORE >>

Source: Groom Law Group

Also of Note

BenefitsWire · A digest for ERISA attorneys, third-party administrators, actuaries, recordkeepers, and benefits consultants.
An informational digest, not legal advice.
BDK2, LLC, 2503D N Harrison St PMB 2091, Arlington, VA 22207-1640

Get this in your inbox every morning.

Subscribe free